pen & glasses
Back in 2006 there was a LiveJournal meme: committing to read 52 books in 52 weeks. Easy stuff, but I had dreams of doubling that, and started keeping a spreadsheet of my reading to track my progress. This year, I finally made my target.

Here's some highlights of the year in books so far:

Best Fiction: This is an easy one: The Yiddish Policemen's Union by Michael Chabon. Easily in my lifetime top 20, TYPU is a masterpiece of speculative fiction. It takes a simple "what if" - what if in 1940 European Jews fleeing the Holocaust were resettled in Alaska, and Israel was never established - and builds a fully-realized rich world of Russian cigarettes, chess clubs, organized crime, gender and sexuality, and international intrigue. It's a novel of circles upon circles of cultural outsiders, narrated by that figure of the ultimate outsider, the detective. It's rich and vibrant and real, and very much earned both the Hugo and the Pulitzer.

Best Nonfiction: Fred Turner's From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Very few books have fundamentally changed my understanding of the world, and this is one. Turner tracks the complex cultural links between 1950s engineering culture, the hippie movement, and the "California Ideology" of techno-libertarianism. Turner demonstrates how hippiedom and software engineering have blended to shape an ideology with enormous impact on our culture and institutions.

Worst Fiction: I read a lot of tie-in novels, and I don't hold them to the highest standards. That said, they often deliver: some of the best contemporary fiction on the role of the military in society is Karen Traviss' Star Wars game novels of a group of elite Clone Troopers. But, Keith R.A. DeCandido's Star Trek: A Singular Destiny. This novel took the title a few days ago when I had to read a full page of Amazon reviews to realize I'd read it already. That's a special kind of forgettable. The main character is an improbable Mary Sue, a banjo-playing diplomat come out of retirement to track down a political mystery. DeCandido took the Star Trek novels in an interesting direction by introducing West Wing-style elements, giving us some insight into the governance of the Federation, a polity which the TV shows never explored or explained very well. A Singular Destiny, though, is C-SPAN with an adventure plot...absent actual adventure.

No Cigar:  No cigar to Troy Denning for the Star Wars - quadrilogy? -  the Swarm Wars novels. Denning took on a rich theme, the Jedi as a political force, its relations to the Republic government, its internal management and accountability - and never reached a level of depth the themes deserved. Close, but... yeah.

Honorable Mentions: Jon Courtenay Grimwood's End of the World Blues - beautifully strange, and well-grounded in observations of Tokyo. Jim Butcher's Turn Coat - Always good, Butcher's on fire in this latest Dresden novel. Great stuff.

pen & glasses
Four weeks, three major academic conferences. Butter me and watch for crumbs, I'm toast. But... I'm starting to see the outlines of a set of thoughts and plans.

Games For Change showed me that what I want to do: make digital spaces for good self governance, to give people the experience of community empowerment, can be done, and has a community of practice and support.

Games+Learning+Society showed me a community of bright, curious, energized people whose company I enjoy and whose work I respect.

State of Play showed me the torch is ripe for passing to a generation of native scholars of games and virtual worlds, and absolutely confirmed that I'm not a research academic. Oh, and that Raph Koster and Tom Boellstorff are made of sheer awesome.

I'm on the right track. I've firmly indicated to my faculty that I'm not interested in doing participant-observer ethnographies as an end in themselves. I want to make games, make digital communities, and test and refine them into spaces for political empowerment.

I still need the academic training: I need tools and methodologies, for building games and spaces, and for evaluating them. I need to understand the role new technologies are playing in empowering citizens. But the main academic enterprise - researching narrow questions in order to describe them in journals no one reads - is not for me.

It never has been: my sophomore year of college I quit my job with the campus newspaper as senior reporter covering local government in favor of becoming a community activist. I chose to go to law school in order to combine intellectual curiosity with practical action. I left corporate practice in order to be executive director of a nonprofit. I chose to go back to school because I came to love teaching, and making a difference in the careers of young people.

I still want to do that, but I don't think one classroom at a time is enough. Technology enables us to reach, to move, hundreds, thousands, more, while academics still teach seminars and sell their books in the hundreds. I want more than the academy can enable.

Next year, I won't be a noob anymore. I'll be at the level I was when I walked into my first space conference, having taught myself the basics of planetary science, rocket engineering and space policy for two years. I walked out of that conference as the leader of a global network of space policy activists and practitioners. I'm walking out of these conferences still a quiet unknown within the community.

But I've identified my goal, found my methods, discovered friends and colleagues, and I'm ready to rock.

batman
I had to crowbar my mind open to pick up this book - and I really liked it.

Some self-indulgent background..... I started collecting comics as an adult in 1991. The last deal I worked on at the midtown law firm cheerfully known as the Death Star was the Marvel Comics IPO. A team of us had to go to the Marvel offices every day for a week to sit and read comics, so we could describe their key properties properly in the prospectus. The junior associate for the firm representing the company was a huge fanboy, and gave us all the backstories. When Marvel President Terry Stewart saw I was really getting into it, he sent me home with stacks and stacks of comics - and I was hooked.

Chris Claremont's X Men and New Mutants were the big attraction  - I've always loved good team stories. But a couple things from DC really gripped me, two titles in particular, both written by Chuck Dixon. He'd just premiered Tim Drake as the new Robin, in a few miniseries, and the Birds of Prey team - wheechair bound hacker Barbara Gordon/Oracle and field agent Dinah Lance/Black Canary. I *loved* the characters. Loved Tim, the odd, obsessive geek stalker, loved the smart, fun women of BoP. They drew me into the Bat world, and, as monthly titles, were at the top of my reading pile for over 15 years (gaak!).

I read comics for the bright and bold visuals (I don't really watch TV or movies much), and for the characters. And across a couple writers and many years, Tim and Babs were two of the most interesting, most relate-able, characters around.

DC often has had stronger character writers than Marvel, IMO, and the Bat titles have seen some of the best.

Until last year.

As I told Oscuro today, I'm convinced there are two Grant Morrisons. One wrote Justice League for a terrific run ("JLA" at that time), and wrote an All Star Superman that is superhero writing at its very finest, capturing that eight-year-old "whoaaaa, cool!" for an adult audience. The other Grant Morrison I think *hates* the superhero genre and works to destroy it. His run on X Men, like his recent "Batman: R.I.P.," was deconstructive, cynical, slimy. Both went far out of their way to tarnish heroes, to ascribe the lowest of motives, and were backed by intentionally ugly art from Frank Quitely.

Batman: R.I.P. was *awful,* and it marked an end to all the current continuity of Bat titles. Robin, Nightwing, Birds of Prey, all cancelled. Morrison was quoted as saying he was going to bring an Adam West sensibility to Batman & Robin, which seemed to suggest that Dick Grayson as Batman was going to be treated as shabbily as Batman, the Wayne family, Charles Xavier and others. And, replacing Tim Drake as Robin with Damien, Bruce's awful retconned bastard son by Ra's Al Ghul's daughter?  Eugh.

I closed down my pull-box at the comic shop, and ended 18 years of collecting.

But a poll at Newsarama, one of the major comics news sites, had 81% of respondents liking B&R, in strong contrast to RIP, and an interview with Morrison suggested good-Morrison was out in force.

So I picked it up.

I'll never like Quitely's art, but it's much more mainstream here than on other titles, less grotesque. A *lot* happens in this issue - an intriguing mystery (why was the drug dealer paying off his boss in domino tiles?), a new villain (who wants to make people perfect by turning them into living dolls - can't beat that!), terrific detecting (from a panicked sentence, Batman figures out the henchman's background), wonderful moments between Dick and Alfred, the promise of a solid arc of Dick's turning the monstrous Robin, Damien, into a decent person, bold visual moments (the cop telling Gordon "face it, Batman's never coming back," Gordon saying "there's always hope," then a Big Damn Splash Page of Batman and Robin, together again for the first time - you gotta cheer).

It is a real change from the street-gritty era of Batman, from the descent deeper into darkness of the past 15 years or so, and, it's about damn time. Comics should be about *heroes* - not cardboard ones, but complex people making hard choices to do what's right. Dick Grayson setting aside a good life to step up into the suit, taking on Bruce's awful bastard son as an apprentice, doing his duty but making the role his - that's the kind of thing that marks a hero.

I think where All Star Superman gave us a hero made of science and *goodness,* Batman and Robin may give us a team made of filial duty - Dick as Bruce's heir, Damien as his blood, and really give us a Dick Grayson that's superhero-as-social-networker, a maker and leader of heroes. If it delivers, I could be okay with Bruce being gone for a good long while.

NYC

May. 30th, 2009 06:37 pm
I digress
I lived in Manhattan for 12 years - and I'd been away for 15, till this past week. It was downright eerie - as I told my sister in law, I more than half expected to see "Liquid Sky" playing at the theater on 6th Avenue, that with a wave of my hand I could part the veils of time and find myself back in 1983, when I lived a block from the hotel I stayed in this week.

A lot of it is the timelessness of the city, especially in comparison to the ephemerality of Phoenix. The building I lived in my second year in New York had been built in the 1830s, and there was a rumor Bill Murray had lived in our apartment not long before. A mere 25 years on, of course, it looks just the same.

Coming into the city from Newark Airport, my cab emerged from the Holland Tunnel and turned around a little triangle by the police precinct house in SoHo - and *bam,* it was 1985, a midnight summer night just after I'd come back from a visit home to LA, and I watched the changing of the guard of the police cavalry, one of the most exquisite little memories of my life - and the shiver as I drove past was the very same one, transported cross a quarter century.

I don't look back much, and I wipe and reinvent myself every five years - which means that 21 year old New Yorker is a forgotten stranger. We got to meet again, and almost touch, across time -

Strangely, my professor, Mina, used this trip to visit the site of *her* youth - it turns out that when we were 21 we lived three blocks apart. Shame we didn't meet then  - it would've been fun.

The current me had strong impressions, too. Gods, everyone had style!  And I don't me designer clothes, or expensive accessories. Everyone was *themselves* in a way I never see here. Clever combinations, changes rung on standard types, nothing bland or generic, everything individual. It was to break your heart.

I loved the people, loved being back in a walking city - my ghastly suburban fat would disappear in two months, easily. But the weather - one of the biggest factors behind my leaving - gahh! I'd forgotten what it was like to be drenched in sweat all the freaking time, and I don't miss that at all.

I'd have had a lot more fun not alone - Mina and I had lunch, but we didn't overlap much, and she had friends to see. But still, a good eerie experience, and I'm looking forward to going back for State of Play next month.

No photos tho - gotta rectify that next time.



ironman
So, I went in to Atomic Comics today after getting called by Alex, the store manager, about my long-abandoned box of pulls. I've known Alex for seven years, since he started as a minion at the Paradise Valley branch, before we both moved to Chandler. [info] - personaltechnosage and I used to each have pull lists, and we picked up 30-50 titles a month for most of the eight years we've shopped at Atomic. So, we were really good customers for a very long time, and Alex is one of the true good guys.

He made me an offer I couldn't refuse. :D  

Instead of liquidating my box, and getting back my deposit ($20? $50? can't remember), they've got a system of monthly pre-orders: you pick the titles you want in the next month out of Previews, and buy just those, at 20% off. Then, pick them up whenever you want. So, if I only want to read two or three books a month, I can get those, then let a good stack accumulate to give me a good day's reading.

It works for me, and it feels a lot less drastic. And, I remembered that I went through a phase like this in 1999-2001, when nothing was holding my interest, and particularly after Larry Hama's Wolverine run came to an end.

We're going to ComiCon again this year. Me, I'm going mostly to say hi and thanks to Felicia Day and see what's coming out from the SF novel publishers - but I'll do the DC panels (though not the booth - it's just not fun anymore, not like it was - way too crowded with, eugh, *collectors* instead of *fans*). Maybe I'll get fired up again.

If not, gods know I get my superhero fix from hearing about [personal profile] technosage 's RP, with a side of extra batsecks :p

Oh, and in closing out my box, I picked up the back half of Trinity and some of the Battle for the Cowl titles. I'm looking forward to glutting myself on Trinity, actually :D

pen & glasses
I'm about to go close out my pull list at Atomic Comics. I've had a box there since I moved into the neighborhood five years ago. I've had a pull list almost continuously since I started collecting as an adult in 1990. Nineteen years of a hobby comes to an end today.

Why? What happened?

Some of it's simple economics: an hour of reading comics costs nearly $40, while an hour of World of Warcraft costs about $0.20. I've been saving nearly $200 a month since I stopped reading in earnest last Fall.

Some of it's some high-profile crap at both DC and Marvel: the Bat books have been my core reading forever, and I just can't stand what DC's done to the titles and the characters over the past year. Same thing at Marvel, with Mark Millar's killing off one of my lifelong favorite characters (and crush-objects), Sue Storm.

There's still good stuff out there. I was really enjoying the new Iron Man series, DC's weekly Trinity, and, um. Wow, that pretty much sums it up, doesn't it? Each time I went to the store last fall, I read less and less of my pull list, till finally I wasn't even bothering with the stuff I liked anymore.

What would it take to bring me back?  I'd like to say, "sacking Dan DiDio at DC."  He's consistently undercut the generation X heroes in favor of the heroes and storylines of his own Boomer youth. His foray into celebrity-author bookings seriously damaged a bunch of titles, especially my favorites, Justice League and Wonder Woman (and I hate to say it, but I was really disappointed by Gail Simone's first arc on WW). I think he's out of touch with a huge chunk of fandom, and likes it that way.

Editorial changes would get me interested again, but the economics of the monthly title will never make sense: no matter how you slice it, they're an order of magnitude, if not two, more expensive than other visual entertainments - TV, movies, Netflix, games. Trade paperback compilations are a lot better - stories are plotted for eventual trade compilation anyway, so, just like with watching episodic TV in gulps rather than weekly driblets, reading the stories in trade is more satisfying. But still - $15-20 for a 20-minute read?

I read comics weekly for 19 years to spend time with old friends, characters I respect and admire, to get my fill of color, adventure, and heroism. Comics still have all those things to offer, if they can get past old-media desperate pandering and sensationalism, and the tough economics of the business.

Still, I think I'll be spending my entertainment time and money in MMOs: I can get the color, adventure, epic storylines-  and spend time with my friends, for cheap. It works for me these days.

Mmm, crow!

May. 18th, 2009 03:25 pm
I digress
I used to hate Death Knights. Overpowered, overpopulated tank-tards. And, I've got serious issues about playing any sort of dark side characters (I'm an altoholic, but no warlocks, ever) or quests I'm not ethically comfortable with (one of my engineer alts refused to do Revenge of Gann, and most of the Tarren Mill quests are Way Out). I'd rolled one when I finally hit 55, just to see what it was like, and abandoned him a few quests into the chain.

It's all changed. I've got a DK I totally love.

I rolled one to join a friend's raiding-heavy guild. I did a few things differently this time: I created a viewpoint character, an alt I could identify with, instead of just some throwaway character.

Kaseido the Dranei worked for me before I'd ever taken her inworld. And I found the DK quest arc moving and redemptive, and deeply immersive in a way little else is in WoW. I was shaking during that long ride of shame through Stormwind (getting repeatedly lost didn't help - and isn't it interesting how much Varian's throne room was designed to Nazi architectural principles? I'll never like the Alliiance) to deliver the message of alliance to King Varian.

And, yes, they're grossly overpowered: my fresh 58 DK had more armor than my 62 paladin tank- and after seven months of leveling tank-spec'ed? Zomg, the DK kill-em-in-seconds thing is refreshing!

I've yet to do a dungeon run - though I'll probably start soloing the lower dungeons just for kicks and achievements - but so far, I like the gameplay, love the look, and have a character I've really bonded with. Enough so, she got one of my two Zhevras, over my main, Paladin-Kaseido (Laevia the hunter Guild Master gets the other at 60- she's just too dignified to ride around on a purple chocobo!).

I digress
WARNING: spoilers for Star Trek behind the cut

spoilers ahoy )
I digress
In short, he so buried himself in his books that he spent nights reading from twilight to daybreak and the days from dawn till dark; and so from little sleep and much reading his brain dried up and he lost his wits. He filled his mind with all that he read in them, with enchantments, quarrels, battles, challenges, wounds, wooings, loves, torments, and other impossible nonsense; and so deeply did he steep his imagination in the belief that all the fanciful stuff he read was true, that...[h]e decided... to turn knight errant and travel through the world with horse and armour in search of adventures.

-- Don Quixote



star trek
Back from Star Trek. Phoenix is made of fail: there were maybe 30 people in the theater for the 7pm showing. I'd insisted we get there an hour early, just assuming the mad lines of opening night in civilization. The whole theater complex was deserted. Bad economy, no local geeks.

The movie: it's nearly flawless, and *is* flawless in the casting, the relationships, the look and feel, the pacing, the humor, the pathos. It may be the best fannish movie ever. The weakness was the villains: they tried for Khan but missed his gravitas. But, with Trek movies, the villain plot is sort of a McGuffin anyway, just there for us to spend time with the wonderful family that the classic Trek crew was.

Abrams has recreated that feeling pitch-perfectly for the modern era. Kirk knows he's hot and gifted, but doesn't take himself entirely seriously. I don't think I've ever seen a movie hero *lose* so many fistfights. There's a key moment where Kirk separates himself from the ranks of Anointed Special Ones and shows why he's a leader deserving to be followed, even as a youth. It's small, but utterly telling of his character as the center of the family of the bridge crew. Their world is both darker and rougher, and Starfleet more willing to trust in talent, than much of what we've seen before.

You know what's interesting? There are no second bananas, no seat-fillers: it's strongly conveyed that everyone on the bridge of the Enterprise is there because they're freaking excellent. This seems to be a new trend in pop culture, really valorizing people who're genuinely brilliant and expert. I like it. 

This Uhura? Shown as being supremely gifted at communications tech. Chekov? Boy genius - and I think a hardcore gamer too :D  Scotty? Physics prodigy. When Sulu says he studied fencing? He doesn't mean swizzle-stick rapiers. Classic Trek implied he was badass - this Trek proves it. We really believe these are the best young officers of the Federation. And Captain Pike and George Kirk... *shudder.* Heroes for our time.

Iron Man brought back the technological hero, and I love that movie. Star Trek takes it the next step, and really valorizes excellence. I like the world we're shown, and it leaves me with the feeeling that Trek has always been meant to invoke - that the future's going to be tough but all right, and that brains and camaraderie will get us through.

Here's a thought: forty years ago, Roddenberry had to tell us that the black woman and the Chinese guy and the Russian guy and the mixed-race alien could all work together in an important job. Forty years on, we live in Roddenberry's world. We no longer have to be sold on the concept that people from these backgrounds could be good and get along. We assume the possibility, so story time can be spent on the characters as individuals. Roddenberry's dream came true, in no small part due to Star Trek. Roddenberry 1966 would have loved this movie, I think: it's tremendously positive, sexy, fun, and proudly, unabashedly smart.



Not a spoiler, but favorite line?  Chekov's droll "Yay."  

So. Much. Love.

Profile

I digress
kaseido

July 2009

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Style:
[personal profile] ninetydegrees

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 29th, 2012 12:09 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios